The Theology of TG: Two Excellent New Articles to Undergird Your Practice of Transformational Giving

As I noted in a prior post entitled In Praise of Works, Transformational Giving runs on sanctification software.

As such, we TG practitioners, more than our traditional transactional fundraising counterparts, need to always keep our theological edge sharp, because it is we ourselves, and not just our technique, that are being transformed so that we may equip others for transformation by the Holy Spirit.

To that end, meet two great resources:

1. David Powlison’s God’s Love: Better Than Unconditional. The idea that “God accepts me just as I am” is often followed by the idea that “It is not only unnecessary for me to grow to fullness in Christ; it may even induce works righteousness.” Powlison debunks both concepts in brief but deep prose. Check out this gorgeous excerpt quoted by Justin Taylor in a favorable send-up of Powlison’s booklet:

God does not accept me just as I am;

He loves me despite how I am;

He loves me just as Jesus is;

He loves me enough to devote my life to renewing me in the image of Jesus.

This love is much, much, much better than unconditional! Perhaps we could call it “contraconditional” love.

Contrary to the conditions for knowing God’s blessing, He has blessed me because His Son fulfilled the conditions.

Contrary to my due, He loves me.

And now I can begin to change, not to earn love but because of love.

. . . You need something better than unconditional love.

You need the crown of thorns.

You need the touch of life to the dead son of the widow of Nain.

You need the promise to the repentant thief.

You need to know, “I will never leave you or forsake you.”

You need forgiveness.

You need a Vinedresser, a Shepherd, a Father, a Savior.

You need to become like the one who loves you.

You need the better love of Jesus.

That’s just achingly beautiful. You could build a champion coaching program on that quote alone.

2. Kyle Childress’ Truth Dazzles Gradually. Principle Four from the Whole Life Offering Ten says, “Full maturity in Christ is learned, not latent.” In practice, that means that churches and nonprofits need to create spaces and places and situations in which their members and donors can grow in maturity, not just activity. And maturity is not simply the result of members and donors pursuing the areas of their natural interest and gifting. Childress compares discipleship to learning how to play the piano, and he offers this piercing insight into the need for mentors (like you) and a “community of friends” (like you should be shaping your members/donors to be to one another corporately):

[T]here is no substitute for the slow, sometimes painful growth that comes through disciplined habits of practice shaped by the crucified and risen Christ.  One does not become an excellent piano player, painter, dancer, carpenter, or baseball player overnight; neither does one learn to become a Christian overnight.  We can’t know Jesus, the Incarnate Son of God, in five quick easy lessons accompanied by an inspirational DVD.  One needs teachers and mentors and a community of friends, and one needs to practice over a long period of time.

Assure your members and donors that God’s “contraconditional love” makes it possible–and desirable–for them to grow to fullness in Christ in relation to your cause.

And may your church or nonprofit be a place that sustains–and insists upon–the slow, sometimes painful growth in the cause at the hands of mentors and a community of friends that marks the inimitable growth of all true disciples of Christ.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Gather Donors/Volunteers Together not to Appreciate them but to Discuss and Debate the Cause

James Howell at Call & Response provides a perfect postscript to our recently completed series on coaching your champions corporately. His topic is clergy gatherings rather than donor/volunteer events, but the principle is the same: gather your constituents together to genuinely discuss and debate issues of real substance, not merely to affirm, encourage, or relax the attendees.

Recently our church hosted a big conference for clergy, with great speakers, lots of enthusiastic buzz, warm feelings, and expressions of gratitude once it was over.  But what is the purpose of such functions?  Do they really help? Or just bolster our feelings and sense of vocation a bit?

I was left wondering this because I left the event to fly to Germany to represent the Methodists in a conversation with Catholics, Lutherans, and Reformed on the Doctrine of Justification.  When I tell people (clergy or laity) of my destination and work, they gaze a bit vaguely past me in puzzlement.  We don’t care much about doctrine.  We care very much about technique:  at our clergy event, if we’d offered some handy tips on how to increase giving, attenders would have been even more giddy.  But if the event had been about the doctrine of Justification, nobody much would have come.

The cognitive dissonance on this was underlined for me in that one of our event speakers, Philip Jenkins, has a new book entitled “Jesus Wars” — so I downloaded it into my Kindle to read on the plane.  In the 5th century, Jenkins reminds us, people travelled to big clergy events, not to be “inspired” or to bask in much-needed fellowship.  They came to do what I went to Wittenberg to do:  argue doctrine.  They even hired armed thugs, riots broke out, politicians got involved, and regular shopkeepers and laborers all over the world were abuzz over the debates.

What topic of substance could you convene your donors–and public officials and even leaders of other nonprofits that work in the same cause you do–to discuss and debate?

Delete your next charity auction or golf scramble–the world is already groaning under the weight of a few million too many of those. Instead, convene a summit around a topic of genuine value and controversy related to your cause.

If armed thugs show up and a riot breaks out, rejoice: you’re in the company of no less than the early church fathers themselves.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

People Don’t Want to Rate Charities. They Want to Become Charity.

The enthusiasm for charity rating sites is untiring…among charity professionals.

Among the general public?

Meh. Not so much.

The main problem with charity rating sites is that they presume a particular relationship between donors and charities that is passing away, namely, the relationship of supporter to supported, where the assumption is that people would give more if they knew more.

Forget that this is a premise that was disproved by social marketing two decades ago (information, it turns out, does not drive behavioral change; instead, small behavior change drives larger behavior change). Instead, try to imagine anyone under the age of 35 getting excited about the charity rating system for which Dan Pallotta casts a vision in his HBR post, An iTunes for Choosing Charities:

Imagine this. You log onto Everycharity.org (or whatever it ends up being called). A website opens: Instead of looking like it was designed by PhD candidates in MIT’s accounting program, it’s as visually seductive and appealing as iTunes…

On the home page, there’s a giant heart where you type in the name of the charity you want to learn about… A video pops up with a great big “play” button. You click to watch the executive director of the charity talk for five minutes about the organization’s goals, the progress it’s making — or not making — toward those goals, and what information the organization uses to gauge whether it’s getting results.

Don’t feel like watching the video? Just click the button that says “Dreams,” and you’ll see information about the organization’s goal for the year and its goal for the next five years.

Watch the executive director talk for five minutes about his or her nonprofit? Read five years of someone else’s goals?

When was the last time you saw someone under 35 interested in doing that?

Now imagine someone under the age of 35 clicking to a site that leads with the following:

Forming a nonprofit organization is a powerful way to support a worthwhile cause. As a nonprofit entity, you are eligible to receive private and public grants and apply for tax-exempt status from the IRS. When you have applied for tax exempt status you can solicit tax-deductible donations, which is critical to fundraising.

Preliminary name search to confirm organization name is available
Preparation and filing of articles of incorporation
Optional preparation of Tax ID
Optional preparation of 501(c)3 application for tax exempt status
More than 1 million satisfied customers
Access to online status center
World-class customer support
FREE Sage Peachtree accounting software
100% satisfaction guarantee
Get Started Now

No contest. Legalzoom.com wins by a mile. And until we understand that people (the group formally known as “donors”) are interested in their dreams (not our own), and until we can serve as a platform (not the main attraction) for their ability to impact the causes they love, we will forever mislead ourselves into thinking that an enhanced income stream is just a few positive charity reviews away.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment