Church is for Amateurs, Part II: What’s a “Christian of the Fourth Order”?

In our last post we talked about how trying to develop a discipleship methodology for training North Korean underground Christians led us to an examination of the methodology of the current NK underground church, plus other underground churches throughout history extending back to the New Testament itself.

Talk about your life-changing surprises.

It turns out that our modern western way of making disciples and being church—with church buildings, paid pastors, congregations of even dozens of people (let alone hundreds and thousands), with Bibles and study materials for everyone—that’s the historical oddity. The North Korean situation of empty-handed discipleship in the face of intense persecution is the norm!

As we studied the story, our eyes began to be open to a whole new New Testament—one written by persecuted Christians to persecuted Christians who had to face the same challenges we face in North Korea:

  • No buildings.
  • No paid pastors.
  • No Bibles in the pew racks or available through the local Christian super store.
  • Literally no nothing that we in the west consider so essential to discipleship.

Instead, what we see in the New Testament—and for many Christians throughout church history right on up to the present—is a church that consistently, cheerfully grows right in the teeth of persecution…through the dedicated service of amateurs with few if any tools at their disposal.

And it’s in those times and using those methods that the church really thrives!

Now, amateur is a word that doesn’t come in for a lot of love in our time. To us, it means “not serious or well-versed in the subject matter.” But that’s too bad, because it’s not accurate. An amateur is someone who gives their all for the love of whatever it is they’re doing. No ulterior motive. No thought of financial gain. No eye towards career advancement. That’s pretty cool, and—as it turns out—effective. Biblical, even.

  • Jesus himself was an amateur—not even a trained rabbi. And that drove the paid professional religious leaders of his day crazy.
  • Paul? Amateur.
  • Peter? Amateur.

In fact, pretty much every major figure in church history for the first couple of centuries of the church’s existence (each of the authors of the New Testament, for example) is an amateur, not a paid professional. And you could hardly describe them as not serious or well-versed: they managed to turn the world upside down, after all.

The Bible calls the amateurs of the Christian ministry world the laity, which simply means “people.” It’s a designation of a new nationality—citizenship in the kingdom of God.

Interestingly, the Anglicans call lay people “the fourth order of ministers in the Church,” along with bishops, priests, and deacons. Lest we think that “fourth order” roughly means “fourth class” or “not serious or well-versed in the subject matter,” consider this definition of “the ministry of the fourth order” (i.e., our pals, the laity) from the Episcopal Church:

 …to represent Christ and his Church; to bear witness to him wherever they may be; and, according to the gifts given them, to carry on Christ’s work of reconciliation in the world; and to take their place in the life, worship, and governance of the Church.

Powerful.

And effective, as Mormons will readily attest. While we western orthodox Christian types have whittled the definition of laity down to “not the pastor,” the Mormons have done the opposite, building quite the religious empire using only laity—their priesthood, after all, is a lay, not an ordained one.

But we need not look beyond the pale to see “fourth order” (i.e., lay) Christians getting it done around the world today. Just look at a map where the church is growing and ask yourself: Who’s in charge there—the laity or the professionals? And look at where the church is shrinking and ask yourself the same question. It’s not like the church is stuck in neutral until paid professionals and buildings and Bibles for everybody show up. In fact, it’s a little bit of the opposite…

Needless to say, all of this new insight from the persecuted church and from across church history proved extremely helpful to us in our discipleship planning with North Korean Christians.

What we didn’t count on was just how much it would transform us—and our family’s personal practice of church.

Join us for the next post as we talk about how we planted a “church of the fourth order”—a lay church—that spread to another country…even before we started!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Church is for Amateurs: A Call for “Fourth Order” Christians Like You to Plant–and Lead–a Lay Church, and a Guide on How To Do It

Church is for amateurs.

Oddly, that’s a lesson I learned courtesy of North Korea and its ruthless dictator, Kim Jong Il—who is perhaps the most violent and merciless persecutor of Christians in human history.

You see, my wife and I belong to a ministry that disciples North Korean Christians. And when you’re discipling North Koreans, you realize pretty quickly that most of the tools that are fundamental to Christian discipleship in the West just aren’t available to help you with the task.

  • Church buildings? Illegal in North Korea.
  • Paid, full-time pastors? We call them “instant inmates” in North Korea’s network of concentration camps.
  • Church growth? When more than two or three gather together (even in somebody’s home in the middle of the night), there the police show up. Guaranteed.
  • And Bibles and Sunday School materials? They’re confiscated instantly, and the people who possess them end up dead.

So in order to learn how to disciple North Koreans, we had to study the existing North Korean underground church and find out how they do it. (There are about 100,000 Christians inside North Korea, believe it or not). We also studied other persecuted churches around the world and throughout history, back all the way to the New Testament itself.

What we found—or more accurately, didn’t find—absolutely floored us.

Join us as we unveil “the surprise of the persecuted” in our next post.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Imitation is How Humans Learn to Give. So Why are Churches and Nonprofits Doing Away With It?

Tip of the cap to Peter Leithart for his post on mimetic humanity, or how humans are wired to learn just about everything through imitation far more than through explanation or training or emotional stimulation.

The issue is absolutely crucial for those of us who teach giving. We’ve written in multiple posts over the years about the importance of imitation as a strategy for training givers, most prominently:

But setting aside for a mere moment the nearly ironclad theological basis for advocating imitation as our core discipleship strategy, consider Leithart’s observation that humans are biologically built to learn through imitation, more than through newsletters, sermons, and tear-jerking Powerpoint presentations.

In Children Learn by Monkey See, Monkey Do. Chimps Don’t, science writer Carl Zimmer describes an experiment by Victoria Horner and Andrew Whiten, two psychologists at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland:

Dr. Horner and Dr. Whiten described the way they showed young chimps how to retrieve food from a box.

The box was painted black and had a door on one side and a bolt running across the top. The food was hidden in a tube behind the door. When they showed the chimpanzees how to retrieve the food, the researchers added some unnecessary steps. Before they opened the door, they pulled back the bolt and tapped the top of the box with a stick. Only after they had pushed the bolt back in place did they finally open the door and fish out the food.

Because the chimps could not see inside, they could not tell that the extra steps were unnecessary. As a result, when the chimps were given the box, two-thirds faithfully imitated the scientists to retrieve the food.

The team then used a box with transparent walls and found a strikingly different result. Those chimps could see that the scientists were wasting their time sliding the bolt and tapping the top. None followed suit. They all went straight for the door.

The researchers turned to humans. They showed the transparent box to 16 children from a Scottish nursery school. After putting a sticker in the box, they showed the children how to retrieve it. They included the unnecessary bolt pulling and box tapping.

The scientists placed the sticker back in the box and left the room, telling the children that they could do whatever they thought necessary to retrieve it.

The children could see just as easily as the chimps that it was pointless to slide open the bolt or tap on top of the box. Yet 80 percent did so anyway.

Zimmer goes on to detail follow-up experiments done by Yale grad student Derek Lyons that produced the same results:

Children really do overimitate. [Lyons] has found that it is very hard to get children not to.

If they rush through opening a puzzle, they don’t skip the extra steps. They just do them all faster…

Mr. Lyons sees his results as evidence that humans are hard-wired to learn by imitation, even when that is clearly not the best way to learn.

Combine the theological mandate to imitate with the biological wiring that predisposes us humans to do so, and one is left to ask:

  • Why do we pull children out of “big church” and put them in “children’s church” where they are robbed of the ability to imitate us? Is it any wonder that kids drop out of church when they hit college age, since they’ve had no experience imitating adult Christians?
  • We’re so worried about offending newcomers that we stop passing the offering plate in church. But how better for newcomers to learn to give than by observing and then imitating the behavior of those sitting next to them? Is it any wonder that we have so many freeloaders in our churches?
  • Why is donor development in nonprofits done as a one-on-one activity between the development officer and the donor, where the nonprofit is asking and the donor is (typically) saying no? Why not place donors in a peer context with individuals like themselves who are giving so that they also can imitate generous behavior?

As we privatize giving and treat it as an individual, deeply personal activity, we neutralize the greatest force we have for growing people in generosity: imitating one other, particularly those among us who are mature givers in Christ.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment