Video – Don’t Cut off Your Enemies’ Head

Posted on March 1, 2013 by tdillmuth

Pastor Tim says that we must recognize that God is present in every situation, including those that involve our enemies. Otherwise, we’ll react like Abishai in 2 Samuel 16 and seek to “cut off our enemies’ head!” Or we’ll attempt to do good to our enemy out of our own strength and our attempt won’t mirror God’s goodness at all. Ultimately, when we encounter our enemy there are only two people present . . . our enemy and God.

For all of the latest podcasts on Doing Good and on past Works of Mercy visit our Seoul USA Podcast Page!

Posted in Doing Good, Videos | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Are We Too Busy Hating Our Enemies to Carefully Observe Their Needs?

Posted on February 27, 2013 by tdillmuth

WLO_doinggoodPost by Pastor Tim – Romans 12:14-21 is a seminal piece of Scripture for not only understanding the theory of doing good, but also how to practically do good to our enemies.  A few of the commands stand out as being particularly relevant for our discussion.  Verse 14 says that we should bless our enemies instead of cursing them.   Verse 17 builds upon this by challenging us to “repay no one evil for evil, but give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all.”

It’s fascinating that Scripture demands that our response to our enemies start with planning.  It doesn’t sound like a course of action that is “spirit-led”, but then again maybe our idea of what constitutes being “spirit-led” needs to change.  One blogger captured the irony of being “spirit-led” without planning in his imaginary book, As the Spirit Leads:  Doing Church by the Seat of Your Pants.  The moral of this imaginary book reference  –  Don’t do good to your enemy by the seat of your pants!

Why not?  If we fail to plan we have a greater chance of being controlled by our emotions and saying and doing things that we would later regret.

Building upon this idea of planning, verse 20 specifically says,

To the contrary, “if your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink; for by so doing you will heap burning coals on his head.”  Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.

In other words, genuinely doing good to our enemies involves meeting an actual need.  Jay Adams in his book How to Overcome Evil says,

The important principle that one must keep in mind in returning good for evil is that the best response is one that meets a pressing need (here hunger and thirst represent, but do not exhaust, that general principle).

God is not asking us to be concerned with our enemies’ every whim, want and desire, but through proper planning to meet their most pressing and important needs.  The implication for this command is that we will already know what our enemies’ needs are.  If we are cursing our enemy, repaying evil for evil and failing to pray for them, then chances are we are too focused on ourselves to know what their needs really are.  Adams continues by saying,

So, the planning of your responses to evil must include research of your enemy.  You must find out his needs.  That may take time and effort.  You cannot simply guess about his needs.  This also takes the focus off yourself, helps you to understand him better, and in the end, at the very least, puts you in a position to do some significant good for him.

Ultimately, this is why I can’t tell you what you should specifically do for your enemies.  There is no “Wednesday Night Church” program that can do this for you either.  We must not only engage in the hard work of spirit-led planning, but also be concerned enough for our enemies that we are intimately aware of their needs and willing to meet those needs.

Posted in Doing Good | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The Text Says Jesus “Loved” The Rich Young Ruler, Not “Tested,” “Rebuked,” or “Graciously Overlooked His Glaring Hypocrisy”

Posted on February 25, 2013 by Pastor Foley

WLO_doinggoodMark 10:17-22, the story of the rich young ruler, is a bellwether text for measuring just how literally we are willing to take the Bible. On the face of it, the story’s prose is so sparse and its implication so disconcerting that we can’t help but be tempted to add in a few words here and there to shade the meaning in our preferred direction and thus cushion the cudgel-like blow to our modern hearers that Mark reports crushed Jesus’ original audience.

Ted Cockle, in his recent adaptation of Phil Ryken’s comments on the story, is the latest to attempt to shield us from the blow. About the rich young ruler Cockle writes:

The rich young man was a know-it-all. He had such a high opinion of himself that he refused to confess his sin. Most of us would not have liked this man at all.

He adds:

{BUT JESUS LOVED HIM}

In fact, it was just because Jesus loved this man that he gave him the generosity test for love. He wanted him to see that he was not the lover he thought he was, that he needed more of the love of Jesus in his life.

These are entirely understandable additions to the text given our hope to tame it a bit; however, they are additions which are not only not well supported by the rest of Scripture; they are not supported by the Mark 10:17-22 text itself. Mark 10:21 does not say, “But Jesus loved him”; rather, as almost every modern translation indicates, there is no hint of a but to be found. An and, maybe; or a then, but no but. Jesus looked on the man and he loved him, period.

And, interestingly, nowhere else in the New Testament is Jesus said to specifically love someone he felt was a hypocrite, or a know-it-all, or, for that matter, a jerk. Scripture tells us explicitly that Jesus loved Lazarus, and Mary and Martha, and his own that were in the world; and a particular disciple repeatedly referenced as the disciple whom Jesus loved. This does not mean that Christ does not love sinners; of course he does. It is simply to note that we would do well to be cautious to read into the Mark 10:17-22 text that the rich young ruler is loved despite his barely tolerable know-it-all attitude.

The Scripture shows also that it is more than capable of noting when Jesus is administering a test, as Philip discovered in the matter of feeding several thousand dinner guests. Earlier in Mark 10, in fact, mention is even made of testing–in this case, the Pharisees testing Jesus about divorce. And in Mark 10:14, a few verses before the young man runs up and kneels at Jesus’ feet, Jesus is reported to be indignant at the disciples for the very unlikable practice of shooing children away from him. Surely if Jesus was going to look lovingly on know-it-alls, it would have showed up there.

But it does not.

There is no hint in Mark 10:17-22 that Jesus finds the rich young ruler to be unlikable, a know-it-all, or an unrepentant sinner. And it would take an awful lot of reading into the text of Mark 10:18 to suggest that the rich young ruler has a high opinion of himself rather than Jesus. Mark 10:17 even shows the rich young ruler running up to Jesus and falling on his knees before him–odd behavior for such a purportedly high-minded chap.

No, if we are going to take the text literally, we are left with no hint of an unlikable, unrepentant, unloving man. Instead, in the verse antecedent to the indication of Jesus’ love you can fairly well feel the intensity and sincerity and sobriety of the young inquirer, on his knees, seeking urgently, as he says in Mark 10:20:

“Teacher, all these I have kept since I was a boy.”

Who would not love a pupil like that?

So if this is not an obnoxious snob being loving put to the chastening by the test of Jesus, what is this?

It is simply Jesus being Jesus, openly, honestly, loving all those who seek him earnestly, inviting them to take the next step down the narrow road of mirroring his love to the world as he mirrors the love of his father to us.

In the end, the fact that we fail to see this is a sign of just how much we all have in common with the rich young ruler. Like him, we will go so far with Jesus, but we will turn aside sadly and go no further. And this is why we seek to make the rich young ruler out to be the worst kind of sinner, rather than a disciple with whom we can empathize because he is just like us.

Jesus, after all, is passionate about mirroring his father’s love into the world. And he knows that we were likewise created to be passionate about mirroring his love into the world, before the sin derailed us from which he rescued and restored us. He never asks us to do anything he has not first modeled for us, and, as Philippians 2:1-11 (NIV) indicates, all Jesus is doing in Mark 10:17-22 is inviting a beloved disciple to do just what he did so that all who see the disciple will marvel at the love and goodness of Jesus’ father–just as they do when they see Jesus:

2 Therefore if you have any encouragement from being united with Christ, if any comfort from his love, if any common sharing in the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion, 2 then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and of one mind. 3 Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, 4 not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others.

5 In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus:

6 Who, being in very nature God,
did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
7 rather, he made himself nothing
by taking the very nature of a servant,
being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man,
he humbled himself
by becoming obedient to death—
even death on a cross!

9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place
and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow,
in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord,
to the glory of God the Father.

Empty yourself in Jesus’ name, the Scripture repeatedly invites us, and you will unexpectedly find yourself  exalted, too–seated with Christ in heavenly places, with unimaginable treasure besides.

Posted in Doing Good | Tagged , | 9 Comments