What Happened During the Transfiguration?

To watch other Voice of the Martyrs videos, visit the Voice of the Martyrs Video Page!

Matthew 5:38-48

When modern readers read passages like Matthew 17:1-9, they can become skeptical. Never having seen anyone’s face “shone like the sun” or anyone’s clothes “became white as light,” and never having chatted up biblical luminaries like Moses and Elijah, moderns are quick to dismiss the whole thing and move on to something that resonates with their experience.

Reading the Bible according to our own experience seems to people today like the most obvious, true, and honest way to read it. After all, the basic philosophy of life today is to assume that what is obvious, true, and honest about the universe is what we can see, touch, or will, as well as what the instruments and sciences we create can see, touch, or will through their advanced technology. This philosophy of life has many different names. North Koreans refer to this way of thinking as “materialism.” Westerners call it “positivism,” “scientism,” or “reductionism.” Regardless of what we call it, it calls the Transfiguration an impossibility or a religious invention.

But the Lord of the Transfiguration is also the creator of human beings, not to mention everything they can see, touch, and will, along with everything they can’t. And it turns out that what they can’t see, touch, and will is…nearly everything!

Human beings see by processing light waves, also known as electromagnetic waves. However, human eyes are only capable of processing a small fraction of the electromagnetic spectrum (a spectrum of light waves arranged by frequency). Most humans can see every color in the visible spectrum, from red to violet, but we can see nothing below or beyond this frequency. We cannot see infrared light, for example, which has a lower frequency than visible light, or ultraviolet light, which has a higher frequency than visible light.

In fact, we can only see 0.0035% of the electromagnetic spectrum.

“That may be true,” says the materialist/positivist/reductionist/scientism-ist, “but we can measure the electromagnetic waves that we cannot see. Through our measurements we humans can know everything that can be seen.”

Perhaps. But this does not account for the estimated 95% of the universe that is composed of dark matter (and a force called dark energy). Scientists know that dark matter exists. Dark matter is essential for many equations in physics. Without dark matter, these equations would fall apart. As of yet, however, no scientist has been able to develop a conclusive method of measuring dark matter, or of explaining what it is.

If human beings are only capable of seeing .0035% and detecting 5% of the known world, why should we assume that all there is, is what we can see, detect, measure, and prove?

This argument is not against science. It is against the claim that everything that cannot be observed or measured is nonsense. Science, itself, never makes this claim. At its best, science is humble enough to know that it cannot prove whether something is or is not. As Albert Einstein once said:

“The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. He to whom the emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand wrapped in awe, is as good as dead—his eyes are closed.”

Science derives its good purpose and its humility from the mysterious. Scientism—or whatever name we might give the idea of elevating science out of that purpose and humility–closes our eyes rather than opening them.

So what do materialism, positivism, and scientism have to do with Matthew 17:1-9? Answer: More than meets the eye.

When we look at Matthew 17:1-9 and dismiss it because we have never seen a situation like this, never measured a phenomenon like this, or cannot will it to happen in human experience, we are missing the point exactly. This is what the passage is about.

In the verse right before this passage, Jesus tells his disciples, “some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.” Jesus then takes Peter, James, and John to the mountain. There, they see the Son of Man—but how? Is it Jesus who changes? No. The Book of Revelation describes Jesus exactly the same. The Nicene Creed reminds us that Jesus is “light from light.” Christ is God, and God never changes.

But if Jesus stays the same, then what changed?

In Matthew 17:9, Jesus describes the Transfiguration as a vision. Jesus did not change; the disciples changed. For a moment, Peter, James, and John were permitted a glimpse into what always is, which human beings are incapable of seeing. For a moment they were able to see something outside of the 0.0035% that we human beings normally see, a matter pertaining to the other 95% of the universe that normally passes right in front of us without our notice. They were lifted above the limitations that we human beings do not even realize we have.

The Apostles’ Creed says at the core of our Christian faith is our belief in “the Communion of the Saints.” This means that even when believers die, they do not cease to exist. Even though we cannot see them, touch them, or will their communication with us, the Bible tells us that these Saints are always with us. Hebrews 12:1-2 describes them as the Great Cloud of Witnesses. They surround us at every moment and they urge us on.

Moses and Elijah do not simply appear and disappear during the Transfiguration. Because Moses and Elijah are part of the Communion of the Saints, they always surround Jesus and are in perfect communion with him. And because they are in perfect communion with the Christ with whom we are also in perfect communion, they are a part of our lives, too, regardless of what our eyes, measuring instruments, and will tell us.

In other words, it wasn’t that the world was mystically altered for a moment in the Transfiguration. As human beings, we are like Einstein’s dead man. Our eyes are closed. The more we know, the less we see.

But for a moment, Peter, James, and John were given vision to see the world as it actually was—and is—and always will be.

Posted in Lectionary Year A | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Two New Books Forthcoming from VOMK (Introduction to Preparing for the Underground Church, Part VII)

(Part VII of VII of Pastor Foley’s introductory essay to Rev. Richard Wurmbrand’s Preparing for the Underground Church. To order a print or electronic copy of the bilingual Korean/English edition of Preparing for the Underground Church, including Pastor Foley’s introductory essay and a foreword by Voice of the Martyrs historian Merv Knight, visit Amazon or click here to visit the bookstore page on our website. For Part I of Pastor Foley’s introductory essay , click here.) 

 

What is most challenging and unprecedented about our situation [as Christians in the West as the sexual revolution pummels the church] is that in the past, when persecution came, the church could return to its underground roots of family.

As can be seen in Rev. Wurmbrand’s “Preparing for the Underground Church” essay, the church could very naturally meet among households, which Christianity has always considered the “first church” of the faith anyway.[1] As Radner notes, family is both “the central basis for metaphors of spiritual formation” as well as “the actual realm of spiritual formation’s enactment.”[2] It is where traditions are passed on, especially, as del Noce points out, “ the idea of indissoluble monogamous marriage and other ideas related to it (modesty, purity, continence),”[3] as well as sustaining Christian notions of chastity, religious singleness, and friendship.

But family is precisely what has been uprooted by the sexual revolution. Thus, the second and third volumes of this series will address the habilitation of Christianity’s “first church,” the family, in the context of preparing for the underground church.

  • Volume 2, “Planting the Underground Church,” to be published in April 2017 as the Lord permits, is a practical guide to how underground churches are built “from the ground of family up” rather than “from the pulpit down.”
  • Volume 3, “Living in the Underground Church,” to be published in November 2017 as the Lord permits, is a set of discipleship tools and hermeneutics from church tradition to equip Christians for hearing and doing the word in the context of the underground church. Our prayer, as always, is that we contribute nothing new to Christian theology.

And indeed, that is why we turn now [Editor’s note: in the book itself] to an essay written nearly four decades ago [Rev. Wurmbrand’s “Preparing for the Underground Church”] to learn that nothing we are presently facing is, in Christian terms, new at all.

For in all times and places, including here in South Korea, Christians must be ready to preach, pray, or die at a moment’s notice.

 

[1] See 1 Timothy 3:1-5.

[2] Ephraim Radner. 2016. A Time to Keep: Theology, Mortality, and the Shape of a Human Life. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, Loc. 2097.

[3] Augusto del Noce, 2015. The Crisis of Modernity. Kingston, Ontario: McGill-Queen’s University Press, p. 161.

Posted in preparing for the underground church | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Is Christ Unreasonable?

To watch other Voice of the Martyrs videos, visit the Voice of the Martyrs Video Page!

Matthew 5:38-48

Last time we learned about seven steps that we should take when reading the gospel:

1) Pray

2) Ask “What Does this Reveal About the Character of God?”

3) Ask “What is the Context?”

4) Ask “How Does the Nicene Creed Shed Light On this Passage?”

5) Ask “What Action Does God Take In This Passage Toward Others?”

6) Ask “What Action Does God Call Me to Take Toward Others?”

7) Ask “What Actions Will I Take?”

But why are these steps so important? Why should we follow them? Do they actually make a difference in reading the Bible?

Let’s do an experiment to find out.

First, we’ll read Matthew 5:38-48 without these questions. Then we’ll apply the questions to the scripture passage. My hypothesis is that applying these questions will change the way we read the scripture. What do you think?

When we read this scripture without asking these questions (or asking these questions incorrectly) we often come away with a list of commands:

“Do not resist the one who is evil” (Matthew 5:39)

“If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also” (Matthew 5:39)

“If anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well” (Matthew 5:40)

“If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles” (Matthew 5:41)

“Give to the one who begs from you, and do not refuse the one who would borrow from you” (Matthew 5:42)

“Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5:44)

By the time we have read this, we have become incredulous. We want to be able to do these things, but they seem impossible! After all, if we “do not resist the one who is evil” won’t we be taken advantage of? What Christ is calling us to do is unfair and unreasonable!

When pastors say, “Jesus doesn’t actually want us to do these things; he’s just proving how helpless we are without him,” we full-heartedly agree. This makes sense to us.

But if we begin by asking “what does this scripture passage say about the character of God?” the scripture begins to look very different. We are still called to follow Christ’s instructions, but these instructions become a reaction to God’s character.

Christ tells us that we are to do all of these things so that we may be sons of [our] Father who is in heaven.” What is our Father like? “He makes his sun rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust.” When we “turn the other cheek” and “go two miles,” we are not sacrificing our well-being to earn God’s approval; we are imitating what our Father has already done and continues to do.

A Bible passage is always more than a series of do’s and don’ts. It fits inside of a context, and that context is key to showing that do’s and don’ts exist in the first place. In the case of this passage, the do’s and don’ts for human beings fit into the wider context of God’s character. It turns out that this is not primarily a passage about us at all, but instead about God.

In Matthew 5:48, for example, Jesus says, “be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.” When we hear perfect, we think of someone who has never done wrong.  While this is true—God has never done wrong—this is not the correct meaning for “perfect” in this passage.

The actual Greek word used here is, “τέλειοι,” meaning “to reach its end” or “to be complete.” In other words, God is like a flower in full bloom—he is fully mature and cannot possibly become any more perfect.

What does this perfection look like? It looks like treating all people the same—regardless of whether they do right or wrong. Whatever God is met with, he responds to in kindness. God…

…does not resist the one who is evil.

…turns the other cheek when he is slapped on one cheek.

…lets the one who sues him for his shirt have his cloak as well.

…walks two miles with the man who forces him to walk one mile.

…gives to the one who begs from him, and does not refuse the one who would borrow from him.

…loves his enemies and prays for those who persecute him

How do we know he does this? Because Christ, himself, shows us this.

These actions all begin with God—through Jesus—and we follow these actions so that we might be children of our Father. Jesus showed us what we would be like if we were not born into sin. When he died on the cross, he showed us what it truly means to be human.

“Okay,” we think. “But I’d never be able to do that.”

If that’s the case, this scripture brings us good news. When Jesus says we are called to be perfect, he means that it is time to start growing up. We do not have to act like children forever. When we slap people who slap us, when we turn away from the people who beg of us, when we slander our enemies, we are being childish. God is calling us to grow up in this passage.

When Christ died on the cross, he did not only forgive us; he gave us the grace to help us grow up fully and become like him.

Posted in Lectionary Year A | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment