Do the Word

When do your donors feel most fully alive in relation to the cause about which you are both so passionate?

Odds on we nonprofit leaders are deluding ourselves if we think donors would ever actually say any of the following in their answer to that question:

• “As a donor, I feel most fully alive in relation to the cause when I receive the annual calendar from the nonprofit I support. No, it’s when I receive their address labels. Oh, it’s a toss-up; they both jazz me greatly.”
• “As a donor, I feel most fully alive in relation to the cause when I receive a report detailing the impact that the nonprofit I support is having. I’m so excited that my money is really making a difference.”
• “As a donor, I feel most fully alive in relation to the cause when my nonprofit tells me what a huge impact I am having by supporting them.”

I love Care 2’s Jocelyn Harmon‘s comment about her grandmother on her recent blog post on passion and nonprofits:

Before my grandmother died, she told me that the time that she felt most alive in her life was during the Civil Rights Movement.  I was surprised by this statement.  After all, she had four amazing daughters and five amazing grandchildren in her lifetime (including me!).  Yet, it was helping to end American Apartheid that moved her to the core.  That ignited her passion.

My grandmother was an amazing woman but her longings and desire to connect to something bigger than herself are quite ordinary.

It would be great to hear from Jocelyn exactly how her grandmother was involved in the Civil Rights Movement. Something tells me that she was doing more than sending in checks in response to fundraising appeals. As Jocelyn quickly notes in her post, donors are not a different species from nonprofit leaders; after all, both want to make history:

Look around and you will see this desire expressed in many ways.  Some people attend churches or mosques or temples.  Others take drugs.  All you have to do is witness our cultural obsession withAmerican Idol to understand our collective longing to “touch the stars” and experience largess.

As nonprofit leaders and movement builders we have an amazing privilege and opportunity to help people connect to this powerful, yet basic human desire.  We can be that vehicle for our volunteers, donors, employees, board members and clients to connect to greatness.  We can help them “make history.”

[Editor’s note: That’s the second post in a row where we’ve heard the nonprofit referred to positively as a vehicle for its constituents. Would that this portends a trend.]

I wholeheartedly endorse Jocelyn’s admonition that time spent helping our constituents to make history using us as the platform is time well spent–a far better expenditure than merely time spent on running operations well for the nonprofit (which these days is really just the price of entry):

The problem is we can’t do this if we spend all of our time focused on the minutiae of running our organizations.  While budgets must be managed, programs must be evaluated, and people must be hired and fired, we must also set aside time for the organization and it’s constituents to DREAM.

When do you induce dreaming in your constituents?

• At your fundraising banquet are you casting a vision for them as cause-drivers…or as supporters for your vision?
• In your fundraising letters are you urging them to dream big about the impact they can make…or are you urging them simply to write a big check?
• In your personal interactions with them, how much of your time is spent discussing their impact on the cause…not just your own?

In The Last Station, the new movie on the life of Leo Tolstoy, there is a fantastic scene where Tolstoy–then the most celebrated writer on the planet–greets his new secretary, Valentin, brushing aside Valentin’s questions and instead asking, “Now, tell me how your work is coming along.” Valentin, a young man of 23, is fairly well dumbstruck not only to be in the presence of such greatness but to have such greatness asking him questions about his work and wellbeing. Tolstoy misinterprets Valentin’s tearful silence as a sign that he has done something to disturb his new secretary, but Valentin quickly corrects him. “It’s just that you are Leo Tolstoy,” he says, “and I am no one, and yet you are asking me about my work.”

Why does that never happen in a donor meeting?

“I have a goal of uniting the entire community of Abu Dhabi — the expats, the locals, the NGOs, the corporate sector, government interests and the diplomatic corps in service and humanitarian care,” she said. “The Salvation Army is a perfect vehicle for achieving that.”

The “she” here is donor Pamela Abdallah, subject of a tremendous piece by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Ann Rodgers, which came to my attention via the good folks at the Duke Divinity Call & Response blog.

And the last sentence of the above quote is sheer nonprofit shockwave:

If the Salvation Army is the vehicle…then that makes donor Abdallah the driver.

And what a driver she is. As Rodgers details, Abdallah has been a virtual nonprofit organization since arriving in the United Arab Emirates since 2008.

Note that I didn’t say a virtual one woman nonprofit organization, because more than most nonprofits I know, Abdallah networks by nature:

When the couple moved to Abu Dhabi in 2008, Ms. Abdalla found no place for her legal skills in the Islamic court system. She decided to focus on volunteer work. While talking with an Anglican priest about unmet needs in Abu Dhabi, she learned about the runaway housemaids and the labor camps.

She had seen Indian and Pakistani men in orange jumpsuits cleaning streets in 115-degree heat while she drove past in air-conditioned comfort. Most construction and maintenance in Abu Dhabi is done by migrant laborers from South Asia, who live in camps about 20 miles outside the city, she said. Deplorable camp conditions made the news in the Emirates, and reforms were under way before she got there. Still, the migrants work 12 hours a day, six days a week, for low wages, and sleep in grim barracks.

She began to visit and bring supplies to a women’s camp. Her first big project took place during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan, in which a daylight fast is broken at sundown with a meal called iftar.

She persuaded a five-star hotel to supply a special iftar meal to the 200 women in the camp. Six truckloads of food were delivered. Ms. Abdalla organized 20 expatriate volunteers to serve and clean up.

Next came worker bus raids:

With the help of a male journalist, she surveyed two busloads of workers who were dropped off daily near her children’s school about what they would most like to eat. The winner was Kentucy Fried Chicken Twisters, a chicken wrap that the laborers could rarely afford.

Students at the American school held bake sales to raise money to buy the wraps. The teens organized the surprise delivery of a Twister, an apple and a bottle of cold water for 150 men. The workers were overjoyed, and the Emirates’ major newspaper covered it.

“My goal is to continue raiding buses at various locations throughout the city until a mystique builds around it and the workers begin wondering among themselves where those raiders will show up next,” she said.

As Mrs. Abdallah did her work, she sensed the need for a broader platform to support it. Enter the Salvation Army, whom she took the initiative to summon:

From the beginning she has prayed for the Salvation Army to bring its tremendous resources to Abu Dhabi. She wrote to officers she knew, urging them to come.

One day, out of the blue, she saw a banner at the Anglican Church where she worships, announcing the Salvation Army’s presence in Abu Dhabi.

Two days later she met Maj. Mike Hawley, who asked how the Army could help migrant workers. She told him about two bedbug-infested sofas in the safe house. Within a day he gave her $2,000 to buy new, pest-proof vinyl sofas.

Notice how when the Salvation Army arrived, Mrs. Abdallah didn’t fall back into the role of supporter, eagerly awaiting their appeal letters so she could respond to their agenda-setting programs. Instead, she set their agenda. And now she plans to recruit people into the Salvation Army–not through their donations but through encouraging them to volunteer and through serving them via Salvation Army programs.

Now here’s the million dollar question (literally):

Given that we know that 84% of donors prefer to be solicited by folks they know, in a future where individuals like Mrs. Abdallah draw on nonprofits as vehicles–rather than being philanthropists studiously reviewing funding proposals from nonprofits in order to determine which nonprofit is having the greatest social impact–who are the people in Mrs. Abdallah’s sphere of influence more likely to give to: Mrs. Abdallah or charities with compelling proposals?

The answer is pretty clear, less so how nonprofits should respond. Should they:

• A: Assume that Mrs. Abdallah is the exception to the rule and proceed with business (er, charity) as usual?
• B: Assume that Mrs. Abdallah is a notable exception (one of the 20% of donors who will be missionaries for your shared cause) and equip her as a special case?
• C: Assume that Mrs. Abdallah is typical of the role donors will seek to play in the future in relation to the causes they love and seek assistance from others like her who can help reshape the nonprofit as an effective platform to support her?

My gut tells me that the majority of nonprofits will answer A, noting, “Our donors aren’t like Mrs. Abdallah at all”. My gut further tells me that the supposedly progressive nonprofits will answer B and thus not change fundamentally, since, as you’ll notice, B still has the nonprofit in the rule of Arbiter Of The Cause.

Finally, my gut tells me that nonprofits who answer C will increasingly thrive in the days to come. Kudos to Salvation Army for choosing this option and appointing Mrs. Abdallah to the chairmanship of their Middle East Advisory Board.

After all, a vehicle should always appreciate a skillful driver.

(A fundraiser’s retelling of Tolstoy’s The Three Questions.)

One day it occurred to a certain executive director of a large and famous nonprofit organization that if he only knew the answers to three fundraising questions, his nonprofit would never struggle for money.

What is the best time to ask for a gift? Who are the most important donors to work with? What is the most important fundraising activity to do at all times?

The executive director sent an email to his entire distribution list announcing that whoever could answer the questions would receive a great reward. Many who read the email hit reply all right away, each person with a different answer.

In reply to the first question, a former nonprofit CEO turned consultant advised the executive director to make up a thorough time schedule, setting aside fifty percent of his time for development calls and then following the schedule to the letter. Only then could he hope to do every ask at the right time.

A boutique research firm staffer replied that it was impossible to plan development asks in advance and that the executive director should put all vain amusements aside and research all the information possible about every donor ahead of time in order to know what to do at what time.

A board member insisted that, by himself, the executive director could never hope to have all the foresight and competence necessary to decide when to do each and every task and what he really needed was to hire a consultant and then act according to their advice.

Finally, a vendor on the distribution list wrote and said that certain matters required immediate decision and could not wait for consultation, but if he wanted to know in advance what was going to happen he should consult wealth identifier indices and econometrics data.

The responses to the second question also lacked accord.

One consultant said that the executive director needed to place all his trust in monthly givers, another urged reliance on major donors, while others recommended foundations. A lobbyist at an ad agency urged him to put his faith in government funding.

The third question drew a similar variety of answers. Some respondents said writing appeal letters was the most important pursuit. Others insisted on taking donors to lunch. Yet others claimed the most important thing was proposals highlighting the nonprofit’s tremendous impact and social ROI.

——————————-

The executive director was not pleased with any of the answers, and no reward was given.

After several nights of reflection, the executive director resolved to visit a retired development officer who lived up on the mountain and was said to be an enlightened fundraising professional. The executive director wished to find the retired development officer to ask him the three questions, though he knew the retired development officer never left the mountains and was known to receive only volunteer executive directors from small nonprofits, refusing to have anything to do with well-established or influential nonprofit CEOs. So the executive director put on an old and natty sport coat in order to disguise himself as a volunteer executive director, and he ordered his executive team to wait for him at the foot of the mountain while he climbed the slope alone to seek the retired development officer.

Reaching the retired development officer’s dwelling place, the executive director found him digging a garden in front of his hut. When the retired development officer saw the stranger, he nodded his head in greeting and continued to dig. The labor was obviously hard on him. He was an old man, and each time he thrust his spade into the ground to turn the earth, he heaved heavily.

The executive director approached him and said, “I have come here to ask your help with three questions: What is the best time to ask for a gift? Who are the most important donors to work with? What is the most important fundraising activity to do at all times?”

The retired development officer listened attentively but only patted the executive director on the shoulder and continued digging. The executive director said, “You must be tired. Here, let me give you a hand with that.” The retired development officer thanked him, handed the executive director the spade, and then sat down on the ground to rest.

After he had dug two rows, the executive director stopped and turned to the retired development officer and repeated his three questions. The retired development officer still did not answer, but instead stood up and pointed to the spade and said, “Why don’t you rest now? I can take over again.” But the executive director continued to dig. One hour passed, then two. Finally the sun began to set behind the mountain. The executive director put down the spade and said to the retired development officer, “I came here to ask if you could answer my three questions. But if you can’t give me any answer, please let me know so that I can get on my way home.”

The retired development officer lifted his head and asked the executive director, “Do you hear someone running over there?” The executive director turned his head. They both saw a man with a long white beard emerge from the woods. He ran wildly, pressing his hands against a bloody wound in his stomach. The man ran toward the executive director before falling unconscious to the ground, where he lay groaning. Opening the man’s clothing, the executive director and retired development officer saw that the man had received a deep gash. The executive director cleaned the wound thoroughly and then used his own shirt to bandage it, but the blood completely soaked it within minutes. He rinsed the shirt out and bandaged the wound a second time and continued to do so until the flow of blood had stopped.

At last the wounded man regained consciousness and asked for a drink of water. The executive director ran down to the stream and brought back a jug of fresh water. Meanwhile, the sun had disappeared and the night air had begun to turn cold. The retired development officer gave the executive director a hand in carrying the man into the hut where they laid him down on the retired development officer’s bed. The man closed his eyes and lay quietly. The executive director was worn out from the long day of climbing the mountain and digging the garden. Leaning against the doorway, he fell asleep. When he rose, the sun had already risen over the mountain. For a moment he forgot where he was and what he had come here for. He looked over to the bed and saw the wounded man also looking around him in confusion. When he saw the executive director, he stared at him intently and then said in a faint whisper, “Please forgive me.”

“But what have you done that I should forgive you?” the executive director asked.

“You do not know me, Mr. Executive Director, but I know you. Years ago my wife gave a one-time donation to your organization. Despite writing on the reply card that she desired not to be added to your mailing list, your outsourced vendors started to solicit her monthly, sometimes through the mail, sometimes on the phone during our dinner time. When she died eight years ago, I sent back each month’s solicitation letter, letting you know that she was dead and that every letter you sent me in her name caused me to relive the pain of her death yet again. Finally, it became too much. I vowed to use my letter opener to carve the words “TAKE ME OFF YOUR MAILING LIST” into your forehead. When I learned that you were coming alone to the mountain to meet the retired development officer, I resolved to exact my revenge on your way back. But after waiting a long time there was still no sign of you, and so I left my ambush in order to seek you out. But instead of finding you, I came across your executive team, who ran a wealth identifier index on me on their iPhones and asked if, given my age, I had ever thought about including your organization in my will. They started to show me a PowerPoint presentation on one of their laptops detailing various planned giving options, so to get out of there I intentionally fell on my letter opener and excused myself to go mop up the blood. If I hadn’t met you I would surely be dead by now. I had intended to ask you to remove my name from your mailing list, but instead you saved my life. I am ashamed and grateful beyond words. If I live, I vow to receive your direct mail appeals and telemarketing calls without complaint for the rest of my life, and I will bid my children and grandchildren to do the same. Please grant me your forgiveness.”

The executive director was overjoyed to see that he had reactivated a lapsed donor and acquired many new potential donors so cost effectively. He not only forgave the lapsed donor but promised to grant he and his descendants middle donor treatment in recognition of their personal encounter and the donor’s reasonably decent future giving potential. After ordering his executive team to take the man home and update his donor record, the executive director returned to see the retired development officer. Before returning to the office the executive director wanted to repeat his three questions one last time. He found the retired development officer sowing seeds in the earth they had dug the day before.

The retired development officer stood up and looked at the executive director. “But your questions have already been answered.”

“How’s that?” the executive director asked, puzzled.

“Yesterday, if you had not taken pity on my age and obvious lack of a pension given my previous occupation, you would have been accosted by that lapsed donor on your way home. Then you would have deeply regretted not staying with me. Therefore the most important time was the time you were digging in the beds, the most important donor was myself, and the most important pursuit was to help me. Later, when the lapsed and wounded donor ran up here, the most important time was the time you spent dressing his wound, for if you had not cared for him he would have died and you would have lost the chance to reactivate him. Likewise, he was the most important donor, and the most important pursuit was taking care of his wound. Remember that there is only one important time and it is Now. The present moment is the only time over which we have dominion as development professionals. The most important donor is always the donor with whom you are present, who is right before you, for who knows if you will have dealings with any other donor in the future. The most important pursuit is making that donor, the one standing at your side, happily involved with your cause, with your organization serving as the platform for their involvement, for that alone is the pursuit of fundraising.”