What Protestant Christians (Should) Believe About the Lord’s Supper

Posted on February 27, 2012 by Pastor Foley

Part XII of our series on Sharing Your Bread

At the end of each series in .W Church (and on this blog) we take time to offer ourselves back to God in worship through the offering of Scriptures and songs which we’ve memorized, and the giving of our 70/30 tithes and offerings.

As I’ve mentioned before, this is also the time when we conduct our “AAR” (After Action Review).

Today, in addition to encouraging you to do these same things, I want to ask you to think with me more about the Lord’s Supper, especially in light of all that we’ve covered these past few weeks.

It’s important, as we partake of it, to understand what we believe about that supper as Evangelical Church Protestants. Catholics believe that the bread and wine are transformed literally into the body of Christ. That is not what we believe.

Some Lutherans (not all) believe that the bread and wine remain physically bread and wine but that the body and blood of Christ become locally present alongside the bread and wine each time we partake of it.

We Protestants believe is that it is not the bread and wine that are transformed but the meal itself.

Christ isn’t drawn back down to earth but we are drawn up into heaven to eat and drink with him there. That is, the communion meal becomes something more than just a bunch of people eating bread and drinking juice! Instead, we receive the meal as an invitation from God to dine with him in the spiritual realm even while we are in the physical realm. As we partake of it here on earth, we also partake of it in his presence in heaven. In this way, the food of which we partake endures to eternal life because our focus is drawn up and away from the flesh and toward the spirit, and we learn to trust that he will provide every good gift every moment of every day, even our daily bread.

So when we share the Lord’s Supper we need to avoid making the mistake that the crowd did in John 6.  They focused on the bread. We don’t look for him in the bread, around it, on top of it, or alongside it.

Instead, we focus on the fellowship in the meal: Christ comes and sets the table for us! We eat with him in body, soul, and spirit—simultaneously on earth and in heaven! He provides the food for the meal here on earth, as he does every time we come to the table. The bread we eat is physical and it remains physical, but if we understand “from where” it came and “to where” it points, to him who is the bread of life in heaven, then what we experience as we partake will endure to eternal life.

How else might the Work of Mercy of Sharing Your Bread impact the way we think about  the Lord’s Supper?  How else might the Lord’s Supper impact the way we think about Sharing Your Bread?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Feeding the Hungry: Romance vs. Relationship

Posted on February 24, 2012 by Pastor Foley

Part XI of our series on Sharing Your Bread

In our last post, we learned that the Greek word ethrepsamen used in Matthew 25:37 means more than just “feed”.  That impacts the way we should feed, and eat with, the poor and hungry.  A can of chili on a curb, devoid of any conversation about Christ, falls short.

And it’s not that volunteering at the food bank or soup kitchen are bad things to do for the poor.  But those are places to begin, not end.  As Lisa Carlson puts it,  ultimately “we must sit with them at the table, as Christ did.” Here’s Lisa’s story:

This month my husband and I shared meals with a handful of women that are prostituted in our neighborhood. We are grateful that they trust us enough to enter our home.As I reflect on the faces of each woman—one stands out to me the most, and this is the story that I must share: her name is “Rose.”

I met “Rose” on the corner of Aurora and 95th street. When I met her she was practically slumped over onto the fast paced street of Aurora, she could barely keep herself awake. I touched her on the shoulder and she looked at me as if she did not know where she was. She told me that she was in pain and that she had not slept in four days. She went on to tell me that a “john” had busted out all her teeth on a trick a few days ago, so that is what caused the pain. Her teeth were all knocked out and she hobbled as we stepped.

I invited “Rose” to walk with me to my home where she could take a much needed, much deserved nap in a safe place. She agreed and this began our 24 hours together.

“Rose” slept on the couch, and as she slept I prepared a meal of chicken, potatoes, bread and salad. I lit candles and put out our finest plates and napkins. When “Rose” woke up, I invited her to join us at the table. And as we sat together, she asked if she could pray for our dinner. Her prayer was beautiful and yet it held a harsh reality: as she prayed she shared with us that she is 40 years old and that she has been prostituted since age 13 when her dad started feeding her crack. In this prayer she thanked God for a warm and safe place to sleep and then she shared with us and with God that this is the first time that anyone has ever invited her into a home to eat.

My goodness, “Rose” is 40 and has been out in the streets for 27 years and this is the first time she has shared in meal fellowship!

I could not believe my ears.

As she ate, she shared that this was the best meal that she could ever remember having and then later on in the meal as she talked about her love of singing, she bust out into song! “Rose” spent the night at our home that night, and the next day I accompanied her to the methadone clinic and then to lunch at Recovery Café.

Rose received more than chitchat and a can of chili. She was received as Christ’s guest but she was not mistaken for him. The food provided by Lisa and her husband was not a commodity but rather a token and a pledge to withhold no good thing in Christ.

They hosted the meal in their home, not on a curb, because home is where they themselves prefer to eat.

The 24 hours of sharing did not end with Rose returned to the street corner to have sex with more men while Lisa sobbed uncontrollably in her car. Instead, Lisa accompanied Rose to the methadone clinic and then to lunch. Christ hosted the whole encounter and received recognition accordingly.

Romance was set aside in favor of relationship.

We grow to fullness in Christ in the sharing of bread not by handing out more and more cans of chili but rather by sharing Christ’s fellowship around our bread at our own  tables. We regard the meal as the meal of Christ, received from Christ as his provision and returned to Christ as our worship.

One way to grow in our ability to host is to grow in our ability to be a guest. So try this:

    • Head down to the rescue mission. Bring family and friends with you. But don’t go to “feed the homeless.” Instead, go to be fed with them—to eat a meal together side by side.
    • Give a donation privately to the mission to cover the cost. Then find out how it feels to be hosted.
    • Let God teach you from that experience how—and how not—to host others.

As Fritz Eichenberg’s, “Christ of the breadlines” woodcut depicts, the Christ who hosted feasts with borrowed food is most easily and authentically found holding the empty bowl and not the full ladle.

Denying ourselves the position of The Great Provider may be the best fast of all.

How does this change how you think about feeding the hungry.  What should you do differently?  What should your church do differently?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What It Means – And What It Doesn’t – To Host a Meal in Christ’s Name

Posted on February 22, 2012 by Pastor Foley

Part XI of our series on Sharing Your Bread

We’re looking this week at the practice of fasting and in Monday’s post, we learned that a real fast isn’t just about not eating, but about sharing one’s bread (enjoying a meal) with the poor.    That’s what the sheep are commended for in Matthew 25, the passage we’re looking at more closely today.

There’s something very important about Matthew 25:37 and it can only be found in the Greek.  It has to do with the word that is typically translated only as “feed”; the Greek word ethrepsamen.

Ethrepsamen does not mean ladling soup into the bowls of homeless people who are shuffling through a rescue-mission meal line. It means something far more intimate than is conveyed by the English “feed.”

It means to nourish, support, nurture, and nurse like a mother breastfeeding an infant. 

One only can be said to feed the poor when one holds them to one’s own chest and shares the substance of one’s own life with them as the token-and-pledge provision of host Jesus. So a fast is not merely a transfer of food but of deep love and care. The food is always the glorious least of what is offered.

Unfortunately, this kind of nourishment isn’t always given when Christians “feed” others. Consider the following blog entry in which the writer reports on sharing a can of chili with a homeless man. Christ appears in the story not as host but as a private inspiration to the giver, who appears to believe that Christ is content with a private apartment in the writer’s heart. Apparently the writer thinks that Christ’s appearance as host of the meal would be intrusive, detracting from the romance of the chili and chitchat, which the writer regards as a particularly poignant show of his own faith and proof that “God is so big.” As big as a can of chili!

Unfortunately for the homeless man, the story concludes with empty cans of chili being the only evidence of a big God. The writer returns to law school, the homeless man returns back behind the gas station perhaps for another ten years, and the writer’s longing is for another “very scary” encounter with the homeless. It is unclear what the homeless man longs for, or what Jesus longs for either:

I have been praying for an opportunity to show my faith. That is a very scary prayer to pray. Sometimes I want to take it back because I’m so scared.

Around noon today I left my house to go to the law school. On the way I remembered what we discussed about getting some cans of soup and having it ready for homeless people if they ask. When I pulled up to the gas station, there was a guy sitting on the sidewalk. We greeted each other on my way in, but that was it. I bought two cans of chili and some spoons. On the way out, he asked if I had some spare change. I asked if he was hungry and he said yes so I gave him a can of chili. Then, I asked him if he minded if I sat with him. We talked for about 10–15 minutes.

His name is Anthony. He’s been homeless for about 10 years. He was really fun to talk to. I enjoyed his company. He seemed to enjoy mine. I can hardly describe what I felt after I left him. It was a deep joy along with a deep pain. I ended up in the law school parking lot crying my eyes out. He told me he slept behind the Phillips 66 last night.

I didn’t share my faith with him, but I showed my faith to him. God is so big. I just asked him for an opportunity and there was Anthony sitting, waiting on me.

I hope to talk with him more. (Excerpted from The Whole Life Offering, p. 72)

When Christians share a meal with the poor, they are to host in Christ’s name. They regard Christ, not the poor, as the central figure of the meal. They recognize the poor as Christ’s favored guests, honoring Christ by sharing openly that they treat the poor with the same honor as they would treat Christ because he insists on it as the gracious host he is.

But they do not equate the poor with the Christ. God does not call Christians to be Christ to the poor, nor does he call the poor to be Christ to Christians. They are means of grace to each other; that is, they are ways that we—host and guest both—can come to see and know Christ more deeply through the other.

Sometimes we act as if it’s enough for Christ to be present at the meal by just being in our hearts or our minds, not in our conversation. But that robs everybody—guest, host, and Christ himself. Christ is the friend of humanity, not just a God who wants to make sure that everyone has a friend. Excluding Christ from the feast is the same as excluding the poor from it. It excludes the fellowship between God and his creation.

The Christian is never the host, just as the poor guest is never the guest of honor; Christ is both the host and the guest, yet in his generosity he shares the hosting privileges with the host and the invitation privileges with the guest. For the Christian, the feast is Christ’s open extension of hospitality and warm friendship-love to the specific guests whom Christ hosts at table. We eat with a real person, not with a generic human container of poverty, i.e. “the homeless.”

The meal is not undertaken in an effort to better understand the problems of the poor. The meal is not an interview enabling us to evaluate whether or not the guest “deserves” more help from us, nor is it a pity party where we mourn the guest’s victimhood. The meal is token and pledge that we will not withhold from our guest any portion of the gifts Christ has entrusted us to share on Christ’s behalf.

Jesus does not say, “Eat with the poor; figure out why they are poor; react accordingly.” He says, “Eat together in my name. Here’s the food. Share fellowship with each other and build relationships with me at the center.”

So we’re called to do more than distribute food commodities to the poor. We are called to nourish, support, and nurture—in body, soul, and spirit—all those whom Christ commands us to invite to his table. Food is necessary, but so is fellowship in Christ. So the Work of Mercy of sharing our bread cannot be satisfied by service at a food bank or soup kitchen, or by eating chili on the curb with a homeless person. These things can prepare us to share our own bread, but as  we’ll see in our next post wherein we look at another story, “we must sit with them at the table.”

Have you ever eaten a meal with a homeless man or woman?  What happened?  What might you do different knowing what you know today?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments