The Only Person In The Bible Who Proposes Using Humanitarian Aid For Evangelistic Purposes Is…Satan. Jesus’ Alternative?

It appears more and more tacitly assumed in missionary circles these days that the gospel message in and of itself is a rather difficult thing to introduce unadorned in non-Christian cultures and that humanitarian aid—e.g., clinics, clean water wells, schools, business-as-mission projects—can act as a helpful icebreaker to ease everyone (or at least the maximum number of people) into the conversation.

The strategy is hardly new, but the origin of its entry into the mission conversation has rarely been noted.

The idea originated in the strategy conference between Jesus and Satan in the wilderness. The two met to discuss a number of cogent proposals from Satan regarding how Jesus might proceed with his pending mission. Satan offers Jesus three very practical and easily implementable ideas, each of which is rooted in the conviction that Jesus’ message will benefit from some kind of practical outworking, some kind of inherently understandable appeal, in order to achieve maximum receptivity.

Jesus’ responses are in many ways more cryptic and troubling than Satan’s actual proposals. When Jesus says that we live by God’s word more fundamentally than by bread, that we should focus single-mindedly on God rather than on our fellows, and that we should not require God to offer any outward proof of his existence, he actually runs afoul of a number of our strongly-held contemporary convictions. When later in his ministry (as recorded in Luke 10) he insists that the gospel be adorned only with the poverty of the messenger (who is not allowed even a personal wallet or spare clothing or shoes to accompany the message), he runs dramatically afoul of nearly every major mission organization in operation today. What about holistic mission? What about capturing interest and building relationships? What about simply getting a visa and ensuring the safety and security of the missionary?

It must hasten to be noted that Jesus is not condemning humanitarian aid. In Matthew 5-7 he strongly insists that it be our constant engagement. However, he insists that it be rendered non-strategically and largely covertly, a message to no one other than ourselves that our Father acts this way and that as his children we are naturally to reflect his character.

Perhaps the problem with missionary work today is thus not that it is not strategic enough but rather that it is too strategic. Many missionaries do not believe it is realistic or effective simply for them to go and live Christianly, humbly, and simply among the people they are called to reach, learning their language and culture and sharing the gospel with them as naturally and plainly as breathing, adding nothing to the local resource pool other than themselves, their message, and the manifest Spirit of God.

Is such an approach dangerous? Yes, though it is not always clear for whom it is more dangerous: the missionary or the principalities and powers that oppose the missionary’s message. Jesus guarantees tribulation for both but promises the missionary that, having removed the barrier of death, there is nothing to prevent Jesus from accompanying the missionary all the way forward to Jesus’ own throne.

Satan likewise pledges to accompany those who employ his methods, and it is one of the few pledges of his that is trustworthy. Wherever humanitarian aid has been used as an icebreaker for the gospel, Satan has faithfully disrupted the uptake of the message such that what is ultimately received is what Paul would later describe as “another gospel,” not quite identical with the original. By contrast, as Paul would himself affirm, Jesus calls his missionaries to be personally unimpressive, only carrying about with them in the physical realm what Paul describes as death, so that even the palest, faintest glimmer of the truth might not go undetected.

About Pastor Foley

The Reverend Dr. Eric Foley is CEO and Co-Founder, with his wife Dr. Hyun Sook Foley, of Voice of the Martyrs Korea, supporting the work of persecuted Christians in North Korea and around the world and spreading their discipleship practices worldwide. He is the former International Ambassador for the International Christian Association, the global fellowship of Voice of the Martyrs sister ministries. Pastor Foley is a much sought after speaker, analyst, and project consultant on the North Korean underground church, North Korean defectors, and underground church discipleship. He and Dr. Foley oversee a far-flung staff across Asia that is working to help North Koreans and Christians everywhere grow to fullness in Christ. He earned the Doctor of Management at Case Western Reserve University's Weatherhead School of Management in Cleveland, Ohio.
This entry was posted in Proclaiming The Gospel and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The Only Person In The Bible Who Proposes Using Humanitarian Aid For Evangelistic Purposes Is…Satan. Jesus’ Alternative?

  1. Beth Gearhart says:

    Having served as missionaries in Africa, our theology sure changed as well! Most missionaries transfer a good portion of their home country to the field. It was our observation that those who lived like the Nationals and among them, were very successful. We also observed that teaching the Nationals to ‘carry on their own work’ was most important. This post is full of wisdom for teachable hearts to consider. Thank you.

  2. James Alexander says:

    You’ve blown my mind once again, brother Foley.

  3. Tim Makarios says:

    I’m really curious to know whether you wrote this post in response to The Intercept‘s recent revelations. Your post is actually dated before theirs, but only by one day, so I wondered if that might be an artefact of time zones.

    • Pastor Foley says:

      Good to hear from you, Tim. The short answer to your question is actually no. I wrote my post in relation to a general trend I’ve noted among missionaries over the years. As regards the Intercept’s report, I have not yet found anyone with any relationship to NK work (whether human rights, humanitarian aid, or religious work) who regards the report as in any sense accurate, and that would include my own evaluation. In my opinion, what is alleged to have happened not only strains credulity, it shows absolutely no awareness of the day-to-day realities of NK work, intelligence work, humanitarian aid work, or mission work. It would be difficult for me to engage the report on any level because what it describes has no relationship to anything that anyone I know has ever experienced. In short, it simply makes no sense. It’s like a really bad fiction story. I’m not saying at all that the Intercept made it up–I have no doubt that they are faithfully reporting what they received–but I am saying that there is generally a standard of multiple source checking that’s good to apply to stories of this magnitude, and I have not heard a single source that has corroborated a single detail. My own opinion is that the information has all the earmarks of information planted by the NK government in its ongoing efforts to contend that Christian missionaries are actually spies for the US government. So that is how I regard the report.

      • Tim Makarios says:

        Thanks for your insights on that. I’ve heard people question the credibility of other Intercept articles, too, so perhaps I shouldn’t have been too quick to believe that article.

        I guess I was readier to believe that article because of what I’d heard about the vaccination programme apparently used by the US government to attempt to find a man they wanted to kill; and apparently they don’t deny it, but do say they won’t do it again.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s